Subscribe to Free weekly SRI News Alerts

Keyword Search
Find SRI News Articles Related To:

Complete List of Articles by Category

What is RSS?
Add to MyYahoo

Please support our sponsors

Recent News Headlines from

Dynegy Abandons Plans to Build Five New Coal Power Plants (01/06/09)

Wells Fargo Exceeds Environmental Financing Goals (12/30/08)

Report Warns of Unsustainable Consumption (12/24/08)

Sustainability Investment News Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it  

February 20, 2007

Aflac Shareholders Get Say on Executive Pay
    by Anne Moore Odell

Aflac becomes the first major US company to offer shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation packages. -- In response to a 2006 shareholder proposal, Aflac (AFL), a provider of supplemental health insurance, announced last week that they are giving shareholders the opportunity to make their voices heard on top executive pay. Aflac crafted an offer that will allow shareholders to cast a non-binding vote on executive pay starting in its 2009 proxy.

SRI Mutual Funds GuideAlthough the shareholder vote on executive pay packages will be only an advisory vote, it creates an important pathway for shareholders to communicate on the issue of executive compensation packages. Over forty companies are facing shareholder resolutions on executive pay this 2007 proxy season as many shareholders look to balance ballooning executive pay packages with companies’ earnings.

"Our shareholders, as owners of the company, have the right to know how executive compensation works," said Aflac Chairman and CEO Dan Amos. "The board's action is in keeping with Aflac's longstanding pay-for-performance compensation policy and our commitment to transparency at all levels."

Boston Common Asset Management, a socially responsible money manager, was the lead filer of the "Say on Pay" resolution. Aflac, Boston Common and other shareholders worked to come to an agreement on the new corporate governance policy, making Aflac the initial major US company to implement this strategy.

Boston Common acknowledges that Aflac already had in place a rigorous process for evaluating executive pay, involving a comparison of Aflac’s performance to a group of 16 other major insurance companies. However, the issue for Boston Common was not that Aflac's executives were fairly compensated, but that shareholders have a right to have a say on compensation.

"Aflac’s management’s decision to become the first US company to agree to let shareholders vote on executive compensation packages demonstrates Aflac’s leadership and commitment to its shareholders and the important role active, vigilant investors have in improving corporate policy" said Dawn Wolfe, Social Research Analyst at Boston Common.

Shareholders will vote on the top five positions at Aflac. Compensation for these top five spots varies as each executive meets her or his performance targets. If executives fail to meet their targets, they do not receive a portion of the bonus, which dramatically impacts the total compensation.

It is too early to say how the compensation committee will work with the shareholders’ votes to help determine pay, said Laura Kane, 2nd VP of Corporate Communications at Aflac. "At this point, it will be an up or down vote on compensation," she added.

Aflac president Amos noted, "We believe that providing an opportunity for an advisory vote on our compensation report is a helpful avenue for our shareholders to provide feedback on our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy and pay package."

While Aflac is the initial US company to reach this agreement, the federal governments of the United Kingdom, Australia and the Netherlands require shareholder votes on executive pay. Many companies and shareholders in these countries feel that since allowing shareholders’ voices to be heard on executive pay, pay packages have better reflected companies’ returns.

Shareholder input on executive pay has not been a focus in the US until recently. Part of the reason it has garnered more attention of late may be attributable to growing public outrage over the widening gap between CEO and average worker pay. Wolfe told, "The gap between CEO compensation and average worker pay has widened immensely over the last couple of decades. CEO compensation was 45 times greater than that of the average worker in 1980, 96 times greater in 1990, and 458 times greater in 2000."

The federal government is also looking at this issue. In a recent press release, SEC Chairman Cox has called an advisory vote "the logical next step" to empower shareholders and Rep. Barney Frank, new chairman of the Financial Services Committee, introduced legislation in 2005 to allow shareholders to vote on pay packages.

© SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it

Related Articles


Mutual Funds | Community Investing | News | Sustainability Reports | Corporate Research | Shareowner Actions | Financial Services | Conferences
Home | Login | Contact | Support This Site | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints

© 1998-2008 SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Created and maintained by
SRI World Group web development services
Do your own research Work with an advisor SRI News SRI Learning Center Home